Course feedback 1 Semester 20182019 |
| Course : COL100 Slot : B | Total students in course : 528 | Feedback received from : 496 |
|---|
Lecture Component |
| Course Organization & Delivery | Learning | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | |
| Poor (1) | 20 | 23 | 21 | 20 | 18 | 14 | 13 | 33 | 36 | 37 |
| Average (2) | 86 | 76 | 75 | 56 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 71 | 77 | 85 |
| Good (3) | 148 | 133 | 125 | 104 | 104 | 98 | 105 | 112 | 127 | 126 |
| Very Good (4) | 122 | 136 | 116 | 133 | 119 | 145 | 149 | 144 | 112 | 103 |
| Excellent (5) | 105 | 115 | 150 | 174 | 190 | 176 | 167 | 124 | 133 | 122 |
| No Opinion (0) | 15 | 13 | 9 | 9 | 21 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 23 |
| Rating | 3.43 | 3.51 | 3.61 | 3.79 | 3.88 | 3.87 | 3.84 | 3.53 | 3.47 | 3.4 |
| Overall Rating : 3.63 |
|---|
|
QUESTIONS:- Course Organization & Delivery Q1. How clearly was the course plan presented? Q2. Did the course content met course objectives adequately? Q3. How were the lectures organized in terms of clarity and presentation of concepts? Q4. How effectively could the teacher communicate? Q5. How receptive was the teacher to questions inside and outside the classroom? Q6. How much did the teacher encourage independent thinking? Q7. How much did the teacher encourage logical thinking? Learning Q1. How much did the course help you learn the subject? Q2. How effective was the teacher(s) in keeping your interest alive in the course? Q3. To what extent did the teacher(s) inspire you to pursue the subject area further? |
| Exams & Evaluation | General Questions | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q1 | ||
| Yes | 390 | 339 | 326 | 416 | 352 | 459 | 458 | 327 | 402 | 306 | 240 | 322 | Just Right | 240 |
| No | 52 | 105 | 91 | 39 | 75 | 10 | 7 | 81 | 37 | 50 | 134 | 101 | Too Light | 41 |
| No Opinion | 54 | 52 | 79 | 41 | 69 | 27 | 31 | 88 | 57 | 140 | 122 | 73 | Too Heavy | 179 |
| No Opinion | 36 | |||||||||||||
|
QUESTIONS:- Exams & Evaluation Q1. Did the examinations test understanding of the course? Q2. Were the question papers of an appropriate length? Q3. Was the evaluation prompt? Q4. Were the evaluated answer scripts shown to you? Q5. Did the evaluation help you to understand your mistakes? General Questions Q1. Were the lectures held regularly? Q2. Were the lectures held on time? Q3. Was the course evaluation policy announced at the beginning of the semester? Q4. Was the attendance policy announced at the beginning of the semester? Q5. Did the teacher take note of the mid-semester feedback? Q6. Was there a significant variation among the different lecture sections? Q7. Would you consider this course as one of the five best-taught courses you have done so far? Q1. How would you rate the work-load of this course? |
|
Q. No. 1 : What did you like the most about this course? (Responses: 378) 1. nothing 2. A4 sheets were allowed so we didn t need to mug up things this was the most logical course 3. No Opinion 4. Nothing 5. Na 6. No comments 7. teacher encourage logical thinking 8. no comment 9. Got to learn a lot in a short span 10. Nothing 11. Nothing 12. nil 13. nlj 14. NA 15. nothing 16. independent home assignmenets 17. THe structure and design of the course as well as teacj hing and presentation 18. Very good understanding 19. It was quite interesting 20. I liked the assignments which the instructors designed for us they were interesting and informative as well 21. The teacher was very interactive and promoted thinking on our own and cleared our doubts 22. Independent learning 23. Course 24. Nothing 25. Scope is very much in coming future 26. Help me to build the logical thinking Abd helped to increase the intellectual level 27. How simple it made the tough portions of coding 28. The Prof was very engaging in the class 29. This course was pretty good It s developed our coding skills 30. I liked how I got interested in programming even though i had no experience whatsoever 31. Quite logical 32. The amount of teacher interaction 33. The course was taught in a very nice way The teacher always encourage us to think ourselves also the communication between the teacher and student was very good 34. The classes were held regularly 35. Logical 36. The notes and all the things which were taught in class were uploaded regularly so we didn t have to make notes and this course had assignments which would always test our understanding 37. Its concept understanding and value to the world 38. the professor was good and interactive the course had enabled me to learn a computer language 39. in this i have learnt the basics of computer science field and it has encouraged my interest in this filed along with this it also improved my logical thinking i can say surely that this course is best one for me during this semester 40. the assignments given to us were awesome and helped us understand the course better 41. recursion 42. Learned something new and interesting 43. encourage self thinking attitude 44. everything 45. Professor and his teaching style 46. It opens our mind and increases our logical thinking 47. Whole course 48. This course contents lots of thing so we can learn lots of thing It is useful for all students who took computer science so the course is good but it can be more better 49. it is very interesting course among all courses it really develop my skill 50. It s representation in class 51. The course is very instersting and require a lot of thinking 52. I would like it because it s important to know about basics of coding for every student 53. It emphasised on logical thinking and various ways of solving any question 54. Coding was a new skill which was taught 55. Everything is based on logic 56. Nothing much except that Parag Sir is a very good human being students should try to become a person with similar traits non academic ones in the future 57. Logical thinking 58. Coding is fun 59. Interaction of the instructor with the students 60. The way teacher teaches in the class 61. Encourage logical reasoning and thinking 62. Graded assignment 63. Logic was the key aspect of learning 64. No opinion 65. Assignments 66. Nothing 67. most interesting course 68. It made a good basic introduction to the computer science 69. teacher 70. Coding 71. Simple and logical 72. This course was very challenging It taught how to think algorithmically and efficiently and I got a lot to learn from the graded assignment provided The best course of the semester 73. It improved logic thinking and the classes were interactive 74. I like coding so as it is a coding related course I like it 75. No comments 76. Nothing 77. Course assignments 78. nothing 79. The way sir managed doubts and helped in thinking further 80. Interesting 81. This course increase the capability of logical thinking and the best point is we can solve one problem with multiple ways 82. learning to do programming 83. Got to learn about programming starting from zero 84. Thinking about every step 85. TA s 86. Nice experience learnt about c 87. Sir is very encouraging and always cheer us up 88. The course was very good 89. The fact that Parag sir was very encouraging and never asked us to lose hope 90. Logical thinking 91. Helped me learn about basics of programming language 92. The way the professor has taught the course is awesome Our prof Mr Parag Singla he s the best I ve ever seen And ya the graded Assignments too they re good 93. Intresting 94. This course would be really of much use in future The C language is required in various academic areas interviews etc 95. once you get to learn coding it is really fun 96. encourage independent thinking 97. Teacher s interaction with students 98. the development of logical thinking 99. Sorav sir was an amaing teacher The course was very logical and hugely interesting 100. this course increase my thinking ability 101. The idea of thinking 102. Coding itself 103. The best thing was that it gives you an opportunity to learn coding although it was very tough to survive 104. TA s were a great help 105. Logical thinking 106. It is conceptual 107. It was interesting 108. LOGIC USED IN QUESTION 109. nothing 110. this course is very much interesting 111. The logical thinking part 112. The assignments and questions 113. Independent thinking as well as making typical things such simpler by teachers is appreciable The assignments provided were really worth solving as those were completely in reference to the ongoing topic thus helping us to understand topics better 114. Everything 115. Practical learning facilitated 116. Nothing 117. Logical thinking 118. Logical thinking 119. Almost nothing It has some sort of intellectual thinking type course so students with high intellect get benefitted 120. I like the labs 121. Instructor was really helpful 122. The way we are allowed to just understand and there wasnt any rote learning required 123. The way Parag sir made us inculcate independent thinking 124. Learned about how the computer interprets different commands in such a basic manner 125. The course itself is interesting and our Prof made it even better 126. We were frequently given assignments so that assured regular practice 127. Questions and assignments were very logical 128. Involved soliving problem by self derived logics 129. Requires logical thinking 130. Nothing 131. it encourages logical thinking 132. Everything 133. In this course I mostly like about the graded assignments which gives us more knowledge It helps us to know and rectify our mistakes 134. Proffesor soravl bansal was excellent 135. logical thinking 136. The logical and independent course then any other courses 137. The professor was very good 138. logical thinking was more in this course 139. Proper notes and teaching by interlinking sections 140. solving complex programmes 141. i am more interested in computers and hence liked all the lectures and assignments so much 142. The best thing is that its the most logical course and requires a free mind and really appreciates independent thinking 143. The assignments were fun and challenging 144. Very good to develop logical reasoning 145. Good faculty and their way of teaching 146. Teachers enthusiasm for making students understand the course 147. The way teaching is done in class using real life examples 148. Assignments 149. Slow rate of teaching and simple problems 150. The style of teaching and assignments 151. encourages algorithmic thinking more teacher interaction fun to solve question 152. New things to learn 153. Organised schedule of topics 154. A well presented introduction to programming and the language c in a manner that was neither too deep nor too brief just concise enough 155. Interesting 156. Logical thinking 157. Logical thinking enhanced interest 158. NOPE 159. It helped me evolve my thinking All the other courses were just based on rote learning but this course is something that helped me evolve my thinking the most 160. Teacher Sorav Bansal 161. The faculty s temperament 162. Thinking logically 163. It made my basic in coding 164. Teacher and graded assignment 165. Excellent logic building 166. good teacher assignments TA 167. The course was extremely helpful in terms of making me grasp at least the very basics of cs The course lectures were very thought provoking and well taught 168. I liked the logic in this course The coding questions presented in assignment were really interesting 169. It was well taught in a interesting way which enabled easy understanding 170. Thinking logical reasoning 171. This course is very good for beginner level coders It introduced me to this world really nicely 172. Coding 173. the interest of teacher and the way he taught 174. The classrooms were fun The professor ensured that we keep going on with interest 175. Everything was perfectly organised The professor never rushed the syllabus which is the best thing Overall it is the most well structured course if this semester The professors know how much load students can bear unlike other courses 176. nothing 177. I like lab assignment Source of practical learning 178. Encourages logical thiking 179. Good course well taught by the professor This course tested our logical skills 180. The teaches 181. Coding 182. Teacher is too good works hard so that students understand the subject 183. The course enhances creative and logical thunking 184. Graded assignments 185. Nice teaching 186. The course gave an excellent introduction of programming to students from non programming background 187. Learning the language 188. This was the most interesting subject in this seem 189. this course is completely logical And i like to think 190. everything 191. Logical questions 192. Graded assignment 193. Faculty was awesome 194. It helped to develop independent and logical thinking 195. Nothing 196. Everything 197. It was all logical and easy to understand 198. very good starting of programming 199. Learning more about coding 200. Way of teaching 201. Logical thinking 202. Nothing much 203. No comments 204. It is interesting 205. No opinion 206. Logical thinking 207. It s concepts 208. I learn to use programming 209. No opinion 210. the graded assignments 211. Got to solve interesting problems and questions Loved to solve them 212. Content 213. It s lab 214. Teaching skills was excellent I didn t knew about coding but now I can code well 215. independant thinking 216. Instructor is always taking doubt and explaning properly 217. Incudes lot of logical thinking 218. Different Way of thinking 219. This course inspired me to study computers and made me realize how interesting it was 220. the way it encouraged students to think out of the box 221. THe way the concepts are taught 222. Col 223. The graded assignments that had to be submitted online were both fun and helped me understand the course well 224. How diffrent and creativness this course requires 225. The way it ws present 226. working with computers and logical thinking 227. Analysing different condition and independent thinking 228. teachers 229. Recursion 230. Strings and recursion 231. Nothing 232. This course mainly depend on our hardwork As amount of time we spend on it that much clears our doubt Lectures do not helps us too much 233. teacher s attention to every student for doubt clearing 234. Content in the course 235. Logical thinking used while coding 236. The course involved logical thinking and the sessions were very interactive The assignments were challenging and interesting 237. Encourages self thinking 238. it enhanced my logical thinking 239. Assignments 240. Mathematical nature of coding It was quite fun 241. Nothing 242. none 243. Nothing 244. The graded assignments that were given to us because if the assignment is graded then we work hard to solve them which will help us to understand the topics 245. No opinion 246. our professor 247. interesting 248. Nothing 249. logical thinking 250. the subject and the subject teacher 251. it was interesting and logical 252. I liked this course 253. The development of logical thinking 254. The professor made sure that most of the class was following before moving forward 255. Kept my interest for CS alive and kicking Got an outlook to some new problems 256. assignment helps in preparation of exams 257. The assignments corresponding to the part covered in the class helps tighten our grip on subject 258. Nothing 259. Structure of course and interaction of teacher with students 260. It was a good introduction on how programmers think so it was interesting 261. the teacher was excellent 262. The contents which are taught us The computer learning is always a exciting thing 263. Got introduced to Programming 264. Professor explained the course in a better way Assignments were very entertaining and interesting 265. It helped to think more logically and broad thinking 266. logical thinking 267. Wonders of Computer Science 268. We get to know about c and programming Its best part were graded assignments 269. I liked the way it was taught to us very much due to which I have grown interest in computer language even more 270. The course structure 271. This is one of the most well planned course out of all that I had in this semester The instructor was good marking policy was good the question paper had just what was required to be in there 272. Nothing 273. dveloped my interest in coding 274. It was really anazing subject 275. good to learn coding 276. i liked the teaching style of teacher 277. Improves thinking 278. Exam preparation can be completed in a day 279. Professor Parag Singla was too much dedicated and interactive in the classroom 280. Coding 281. teacher s communication with us 282. I like the way of teaching of prof parag single 283. It focuses on logical thinking 284. everything 285. It was about something which I never studied before 286. Teaching was good 287. It developed an interest in coding and has encouraged me to take up more courses of computer 288. Thinking of algorithms is the best thing I like about this course 289. In this course i really enjoyed coding and finding out new solutions for the same question 290. Teacher interaction with students 291. Logical reasoning and algorithmic thinking 292. Learning new things in every lecture topics are somewhat independent 293. Very well structured 294. c 295. The level of questions given to us in assignments and exams 296. independent thinking was encouraged and topics were taught in an interesting manner 297. introduction to algorithms and more emphasis on problem solving 298. Nothing as it was not able to give the complete idea of what this field is 299. No opinion 300. Coding 301. Class was really interactive 302. learning new things 303. Too easy 304. It s just awesome 305. Thinking about algorithms 306. The basics of coding are taught in this course which is necessary 307. Everything 308. It s quality and the way it was taught 309. Logic applications 310. Nice Course in the flourishing area of CS IT 311. the interaction with the teacher was the best in this course 312. nothing much 313. I got used to system 314. I liked the variation and the variability of thoughts a algorithms One better than other and the continuos process of improvisations in solutions 315. The teachers were great 316. This course is good for CS students and the intrested ones Something new is there in this course that might be fine for some students 317. Atleast it will be useful once in my life 318. The professor Dr Sourav Bansal was extremely receptive to questions He made great effort to make sure everyone had understood whatever was being taught He is definitely one of the sweetest professors I ve had in the first semester 319. programming and coding is addictive 320. The topics taught were very interesting and were understood very clearly through the lectures 321. Independent thinking 322. The course improved our logical thinking skills 323. No comment 324. The course was really fun and instructors made sure that class is with them 325. independent thinking with very few knowledge xD 326. Assignments 327. everything 328. I got to learn coding for the first time 329. The thing I liked the best about this course is that it encourages us to think logically and creatively 330. Systematic execution and great coverage of concepts with great logical discussion 331. the logical thinking required to solve the questions 332. It is kind of a course which I didn t learn before This course help us to strengthen our logical thinking 333. It taught us to write programs which ofcourse is essential in almost every field today 334. practical knowledge 335. the assignments that could be done easily at our convenience within a week 336. The basic understanding of programming languages was made clear 337. Enabled logical thinking and reasoning Also debugging your own solution developed me as a whole 338. Some topics i hadn t studied before 339. logical thinking abilty 340. interaction of teachers with students 341. Nothing 342. Got a basic idea about programming 343. interaction of teacher with student 344. COURSE CONTENT 345. Thinking 346. This gives us exposure to the coding world that s the best thing of the course 347. Technical 348. I like the way the teacher taught it logically it inspired me to study the subject more 349. Nothing 350. It is a new subject different from ones taught in school and an interesting one 351. Course itself 352. everything 353. libert to think as per our thought 354. Teacher 355. learned the basic coding required 356. helps to think logically 357. Logical thinking 358. No opinion 359. We were not supposed to memorise things but only think logically 360. Best among the rest 5 361. Nothing 362. Coding 363. Nothing 364. It builds our logical thinking 365. Logical thinking 366. It was completely new thing for me i liked the analytical thinking approach 367. Learning c 368. no opinion 369. no comments 370. Nothing 371. teacher was clearing individual doubts 372. no 373. Nothing 374. Nothing 375. no 376. N 377. nothing 378. nothing Q. No. 2 : What did you dislike the most about this course? (Responses: 372) 1. nothing 2. basic syntax was not taught clearly so it was difficult to catch initially what is going on 3. No Opinion 4. Nothing 5. Na 6. No comments 7. everything well 8. no comment 9. A little heavy 10. Nothing 11. Nothing 12. nil 13. mllk 14. too hard content for this level of course 15. nothing 16. nothing 17. Not much practice was given Graded assignments had 3 questions which could be done for the whole week but in exams we had 4 or 8 questions that we had to do in 1 or 2 hrs practice was not given according to paper 18. The graded assignments required too much time and effort 19. Nothing 20. Stanford library was taught in class which I consider is useless 21. This course is really very tough for students who did not have computers as a subject before I struggled a lot 22. The class very rarely but sometimes became monotonous 23. Short time span to learn the course 24. Course 25. I was not able to understand much 26. Sometimes the assignments are quite difficult and lengthy and requires the whole day for its completion 27. Some students were so damn brilliant in the beginning i was so tensed because i was not even able to understand what was going on and why tho 28. Hard graded assignments 29. The Prof used to overwrite on the slides 30. No 31. The questions asked were too complex and we did not get nearly enough practice of algorithms giving unfair advantage to students who have done it in the past 32. Work load is quite heavy 33. Classes were easy but assignments were hard 34. The time availability was less during the semester so the students who have never studied COL before like me faced problems in assignment 35. The test papers were much harder than expected 36. Nothing 37. The biggest problem was the assignments which were given in this course we were allowed to write the code in our hostel i e outside the lab which wasn t good at all since the code sharing could be done easily 38. Course load is too Heavy and is done very fast in class 39. some of the graded assignments were too difficult 40. as all the things was fine but there should be more help from the staff in encouraging us to do new assignments by us 41. please use computer to teach this course like make real time programs during lecture hours and help us identify probable mistakes and codes that would be much better 42. file I O because i confused many times 43. Nothing 44. nothing 45. nothing 46. work Load Graded assignments occupied most of our weekdays 47. The things done in class are very different and very basic as compared to the lab assignments exams 48. Course was too lengthy and hard to understand the concepts 49. Nothing 50. This course is good but those students who had not done like this course they face trouble to understand this course Only on the basis of theory we can not understand this course properly 51. sometimes when my code show some error then i hate this subject so in my opinion some extra help must be provided less example are taken by instructor in class 52. Time for assignments 53. Lot of hard work is required to be expert 54. The most disliked think for me to related this course is it s marking system of exams and lengthy and hard questions 55. Nothing as such 56. The course can be very easy for the people who have learned a language in 9th or 10th class and it is very tough for the students who are learning it here the first time 57. None 58. Almost everything except Parag Sir obviously The way it was taught in the classroom I didnt feel concepts were given adequate time in the class Things taught were difficult to grasp and I dont think thats the right way c ought to be taught 59. Heavy workload 60. I am a civil engineering student so I don t understand the need of this course 61. Deviation from the main topic quite often in the lectures earlier on 62. In starting students face a quite difficulty 63. Sometimes it seemed course was being taurht rapidly 64. Not covering all the topics in graded assignment 65. Lack of Time and Unfair Distribution of students 66. Not able to understand 67. Nothing 68. Everything i don t like coding 69. Tough Questions 70. daily assg 71. Big O 72. Lengthy ordinary codes 73. The examples that were taught in the class should have been more difficult and vast as it caused a lot problem while solving the graded assignment 74. the lecture becomes monotonous after some time and the complication related to the use of SPL in class and practice but the use STL in graded assignments 75. nothing 76. No comments 77. Everything 78. Not anything 79. No one cares about the difference created between the students who have no coding background and the ones who knew coding before 80. Burden 81. Nothing 82. syllabus too long 83. Work load was too heavy 84. Nothing 85. assignments because it should tell in the beginning of the course that laptop and regular is extremely important other u would lag far behind your other classmates 86. It was very tough for me 87. The course moved at a very fast pace which created a problems for beginners like us and lead to lose confidence and interest in this course which leaded to our downfall further It was quite unfair as most students already knew many things about coding 88. Nothing I like the course 89. The fact that people who had previous coding background had an edge over others 90. Very tough for new computer users 91. Very tough graded assignments 92. Nothing much sometimes the pace is too slow 93. Too much syllabus 94. The graded assignments which have became very lengthy by the end of semester and they the same time they were also very tough for students like me who don t have any background learning of coding 95. the teacher doesn t encourage independent thinking 96. to much hard stuff given straight way 97. Graded assignments were too difficult 98. the assignments kept us occupied throughout the week 99. Use of stanford library 100. teachers behave like the studnt already know much much about subject 101. More questions should be discussed in the class 102. Graded assignment were too difficult 103. This course is too tough which eventually results in dying interest in the course 104. You can only perform good in the exam if you have done the problem set or have learnt certain algorithms 105. Nothing 106. Not scoring for me 107. Workload of assignments and their deadlines 108. THE REGULAR GRADED ASSIGNMENT 109. everything 110. in starting we need to put hard work to get in flow 111. The quantity of the assignments 112. The way question paper are made 113. Some of TA s of this course didn t help much 114. Nothing 115. Content could have been improved 116. Everything 117. Debugging is tiresome 118. Too much thinking required sometimes 119. Everything from teacher to its content taught in lectures and labs Only the student who have access to coding earlier got benefit in getting marks and I have not got positive intent from this course 120. But TA s were not good they not tell the debuggeing of code 121. My GAs arent graded please grade my GAs 122. None 123. The level increased suddenly 124. Nothing 125. The assignments were okay but during holidays they were painful 126. The teachers write the code instead they should type it on any platform 127. Nothing 128. Stanford library 129. How it ruined computer science for me 130. the word load is too much 131. None 132. Making ungraded assignments as partial And giving big codes which is difficult at the stage of learning 133. System of graded assignments 134. less homework 135. If you don t understand the things at right time you lag at every upcoming thing and learning 136. Long graded assignments 137. too much thinking 138. Lesser number of data structures taught 139. nothing 140. ungraded assignments were also said to be graded but i didn t understand how would they grade it so felt a bit unclear 141. Actually the assignments are sometimes a load as there are other courses too which present some difficults assignments sometimes and its difficult to handle all at the same time 142. I have already learnt most of the topics taught in the class before So i did not feel it much useful 143. Actually we couldnt learn much frm the course I was expecting to learn something higher 144. The course is very less it looks like the course can be easily made 1 5 times of now without any problem to students 145. Hectic assignments 146. Not covering OOPS part of C 147. Nothing 148. Nothing 149. Nothing 150. less material and questions for practice there was literally no practice sheets for homework assignment are not adequate for this task 151. Too much pace 152. 1 or 2 topics like debugging and Big O were not explored much 153. Everything was pretty much perfect except that a reading a text book which was proposed but not implemented well should also be encouraged Not that it is actually needed but it would enhance the course experience 154. Stanford 155. Work load too heavy 156. Less practice material 157. NOPE 158. Through other people who knew told me that the thing taught in one sem was very less 159. Late results 160. The oversimplified nature 161. We use different libraries in class and different in labs Time limit of lectures 162. Difference between spl and stl library 163. Exams 164. Confusion regarding standard and stanford library 165. slow speed 166. Funnily enough the assignments of col100 Jokes apart I don t think the course was in any way detestable 167. I dislike the assignment deadlines and timings We were given assignment at wrong time during rdv and now in majors 168. It is available only in sem 1 Wanted the course to be extended further 169. Assignments at the time of holidays 170. The teachers did not even introduce us to world of competitive coding which i would really like to explore 171. Assignment 172. sometopics were not covered like classes structures 173. Work load was too less So I used to lose track 174. Minors are paper pen test which does not go with this course Either minors may be computed based or graded assignments should be given more weightage 175. very fast 176. Ungraded assignment 177. Sometimes codes are very hard 178. The workload given for each week was too much 179. The difficulty of exams 180. None 181. Assignment difficulty level rose exponentially 182. Nothing 183. Ungraded assignments 184. If more practice problems were given it could have been better 185. Nothing 186. Sometimes lecture got boring 187. I felt one and half hour lecture was too tiring 188. it was the best course 189. Assignment were given regularly which contains very hard logical thinking and time provided was limited 190. Partially graded assignment 191. Course was not focused on probleme solving 192. At times the graded assignments were a bit lengthy and caused confusion that which member functions to use 193. Everything 194. Nothing 195. Many lectures were repetitive 196. little bit hard for bigginers 197. Restricted to use Stanford library in moodle 198. Nothing 199. Not enough emphasis on learning syntax 200. No comments 201. Only that it might have been taught better if the teacher could code along more often 202. No opinion 203. Nothing 204. Nithing 205. It was very hard to thik about codes 206. No proper help provided to learn the course NOT AT ALL 207. none 208. The TA s weren t that helpful to our learning Didn t teach something new and different Everything was left on lectures Lab sessions were not useful at all 209. Length of lectures 210. It s syllabus 211. Assignments took so much time that was so bothering but that was for practice so i can find my mistakes 212. Too much load Codes and codes everywhere 213. length of class 214. Assignment somtimes reduse the time to be given to other courses 215. Many a times get stuck in a question which wastes a lot of time 216. Nothing 217. nothing 218. the labs sessions 219. Syntax was not so much stressed 220. Assignments 221. The question paper in the majors was mostly focused on a single topic We should have been allowed to do the questions using the method we want We are just beginners to programming 222. Nothing 223. The course we going slowly 224. end part is very subtle 225. Nothing 226. theory 227. As such no topic 228. Everything 229. As I was new to CS course and this course does not encourage me to take interest in it 230. assignments given are not enough to give a good grasp of understanding of subject 231. Work load 232. Nothing 233. Nothing 234. Nothing 235. it involved too much thinking and there was no direct way to get to the logic 236. Stanford Library functions 237. The evaluation didn t support partial grading Either we got a 0 or full 238. Very hard 239. none 240. Nothing 241. lecture classes 242. No opinion 243. Assignments load 244. timr taking 245. Nothing 246. some of the graded assignments were too tough 247. Graded assignments 248. it coverd a lots of content which was as per me not of use for me 249. assignments are very difficult and question in exams are also very difficult 250. Nothing as such 251. nothing in particular 252. Just that the classes would become boring because the professor could not make the classes very interesting 253. in assignments you can not see the all testcases so it makes hard to check the the fault in code 254. graded assignment hardness move in a step wise manner rather it should be in graduall increase 255. Length of lecture 256. Everything 257. Nothing 258. Links to relevant practice problems were not given teaching us Stanford library meant we couldn t practice some code on other sites That was rectified though 259. nothing 260. There are too many assignments 261. We used two libraries and so had to memorise two pair of functions The course was more oriented towards marks and grades than towards actual learning 262. Only two classes a week 263. It was not that much able to keep student s constant intrest in it 264. nothing 265. Course was bit tough Less practice and lack of good questions 266. The confusion that was created due to the use of Stanford library 267. The workload was a bit too much 268. The marking scheme of grading the online assignments was not up to the mark for eg if a student has written the whole code correct but just due the tiniest error he she is getting a 0 out of 10 or 20 This wasn t justified 269. was tough in the beginning 270. It ended so early huh 271. nothing 272. the material was too short 273. Nothing 274. No opinion 275. Can t Comment 276. due to having problem in english language i didn t learn course much 277. I found that questions asked in examination are difficult from that in assignments and lectures 278. Assignments were given at wrong time 279. nothing 280. As it was a completely new thing for me it requires me more time to understand things but due to too difficult graded assignments it causes loss of time which I decided to give to other subjects 281. A bit fast 282. The course revolves around just data structures If you could teach something more than that it would have been more interesting 283. Our teacher is very good but sometimes he explains too much and focus on small things a bit too much 284. At times i was forced to spend my whole days work on this subject I mean the work load is heavy during some weeks 285. Lack of practice and confusion regarding standard library 286. Confusion among libraries 287. Non graded assignment are very bad 288. assignments 289. We were taught very less algorithms 290. somtimes boring lectures 291. nothing 292. The codes that the professor make should be made of some ide as in some cases even the prof conveys some wrong thing 293. Nothing as such 294. When program don t work in assignment 295. Presentation was not that great 296. sometimes graded assignments 297. Too easy didn t cover much about c or logical thinking 298. The pace becomes slow at the end of the course 299. Nothing as such 300. Nothing 301. Nothing 302. There was confusion between standard and stanford library function 303. Nothing 304. Maybe more could be taught 305. introduction of multiple libraries in doing the same sort of work 306. nope 307. Nothing much 308. I think the Non Graded assignments as they should be Automatically evaluated though Not graded 309. The grading process of assignments 310. This couse is totally imposed over us We didn t take this department by our choice then also it has been taught to us We are not able to learn clearly because we were not having any computer background 311. There is no proper merhod to teach 312. The lab was a source of great pain The attendance policy of the lab was never made clear The TAs left much to be desired in all aspects The introduction of partially graded assignments was also disliked There was never clarity regarding their weightage 313. in the minors time alloted was quite less given the fact that most of us new to coding though we had the logic we failed to express it in the paper coz of time crunch 314. The course is too hectic 315. nothing 316. I disliked the fact that we always had the burden of a graded assignment every alternate week that too with a deadline 317. No comment 318. I found some graded assignment too difficult compared to the level taught in class 319. the variation between depth of topic discussed in the class versues questions asked in graded assignments and examinations 320. Nothing 321. nothing 322. Difficulty 323. The thing I disliked about the course is that instead of the graded assignments there should be number of pen and paper tests 324. the way it was taught in class 325. It was very difficult for me I was struggling till last 326. Very few examples were discussed in class 327. question papers were hard 328. the minors and majors were taken on paper which destroys the essence of coding 329. The pace to cope up with theentirely new topic for newbies 330. Graded assignments weren t balanced Either they were too easy or too difficult 331. a repeatition of most of the things for me 332. grading scheme 333. assignments 334. Nothing 335. Different function libraries were introduced 336. assignment deadlines 337. PARAG SINGHLA S HANDWRITING 338. Confusion among libraries 339. The load of this course is the most on us 340. Nothing 341. There are many tough questions that can take days to answer 342. Everything 343. Nothing 344. Course itself 345. nothing 346. ll 347. Assignments 348. lectures were kind of boring 349. nothing 350. Work load every week a new assignment and the pressure to complete before the deadline 351. Prof 352. The grading policy which was not finalised or not informed to the students in time 353. Change of library function 354. Nothing 355. introduction of Stanford library 356. Nothing 357. This course shouldn t be compulsory to all department students 358. nothing in particular 359. Work load 360. It was little tough for people without prior knowledge 361. Course workload was too heavy 362. no opinion 363. no comments 364. Nothing 365. nothing 366. no 367. the batch size 368. Everything 369. no 370. n 371. exam and assignment questions 372. The assignments were too difficult considering that most students have never done coding in their schooling Q. No. 3 : Any Suggestions or comments about the course. (Responses: 349) 1. nothing 2. tell us syntax more clearly 3. No Opinion 4. No 5. Na 6. No comments 7. no 8. no comment 9. Excellent course 10. No 11. No 12. nil 13. viuhoi 14. NA 15. nothing 16. nope 17. give more practice questions and more solved examples and practice assignments according to those in exams 18. no 19. Do not teach Stanford library 20. It would be good if you slow down the pace and teach everything from basics 21. No 22. No suggestions 23. Course should be easy 24. Methods should be devised to develope analytical thinking skills for problem solving 25. No comments 26. More questions and examples should be included in the course Without sufficient examples and practice we are asked to solve graded assignments The typed theory is not satisfactory in terms of clarity and examples 27. I think assignment s solution should be pasted on moodle 28. marks distribution should be told earlier 29. A slightly lower difficulty 30. no 31. No suggestions 32. No 33. All the assignments given in this course should only be allowed to do live in the lab sessions 34. Update the course and made it according to need of industry 35. no comments 36. no thank you 37. remove carrel part it misdirects students and makes us lose interest in coding 38. no 39. This is an interesting course so try to make it more interesting 40. no comments 41. no 42. The workload should be decreased somewhat 43. No 44. No 45. There should be practical in the class in which the program should be made in front of students so that they can understand easily this course 46. instructor must explain more example realated to given topic some more interesting topics must be add to lectures 47. More time for assignments 48. Good course and would like to do such course in future 49. My suggestions for this course is to make the exam papers little easier so that students who are week in this course are also take interest in it 50. Slowing down the pace and deep explanation of the topic would be beneficial 51. Java should be introduced 52. Pleaseeeeeee Rethink the validity of the course It isnt a course to be done over 4 months time It requires more time and exposure for first timers This course can definitely be replaced by something better It simply killed off my interest inthesubject 53. No 54. No suggestions 55. No 56. During start you should make students practice 57. Good one 58. No 59. Those who have not done coding before should be taught from basics 60. No 61. No 62. Don t know 63. reduce the graded assg 64. No 65. No 66. The syllabus should be presented more clearly as to what we will be able to do with the knowledge of the topic 67. more questions can be done in class to get a detailed idea about the topic 68. no 69. No comments 70. No comments 71. Not much 72. This course should be planned differently for the students who know coding before the start of this course and the ones who do not have any coding background 73. No 74. Teacher should uploaded practice programs related to the topic that they thought in the classroom as soon as possible and their should no deadline for them 75. syllabus should be short 76. It could exclude some of the topics taught 77. No 78. i want to study col but my bad cg restricts me to do so please help me to get a minor course in col because it began to fascinates me in the end when my cg was already drained badly 79. No suggestions 80. Practice questions and extra help session should be kept instead of unnecessary labs where we go only to kill the time 81. More help seesion can be provided 82. Children should be segregated on the basis of their earlier exposure to the subject 83. None 84. Level of graded assignments should be less 85. More content can be taught but in the end it s upto the instructors Pointers could have been taught 86. No 87. Please try to be more practical teach us how we can reduce the number of errors because sometimes the code written by teacher in class also contains many errors and even some member functions which are not supported by moodle background 88. the level of difficulty should have been increased gradually 89. try to keep up with pace of students who haven t coding before and are slow at it 90. No 91. lectures must be a little more interesting 92. None 93. you should teach basic of the subject 94. More and more practice questions should be given 95. This course should be taught with more details and in small steps as it s very tough for a person like me who had never studied computer science at this level to pace up with the spead of the class 96. Organise more labs 97. Exam should be on computer 98. Nope 99. No 100. NO 101. The lenght of assignments is more Some short assignments should also be given to improve the course understanding 102. None 103. More topics should be added to this course to make it even more typical and interesting 104. No 105. Every week there should be an assignment which is graded regularly with a fixed deadline day 106. No 107. No 108. A sheet of questions should be provided for more practice just like tutorials in other courses 109. Remove lab assignment for marks so that only the ones can do who have interest in coding Wants no pressurisation on students regarding this 110. Improve Labs TA and increase the participants of teacher in labs 111. My GAs arent graded please grade my GAs 112. None 113. Detailed plannings should be given at the beginning 114. None 115. Nothing much 116. None 117. No need 118. Using debuuger linux stanford etc All this i could not learn 119. No comments 120. None 121. there should be lab tests instead of lab assignments and have to be completed in the lab itself so that there is no copying 122. None 123. Please give assignments in a easy to difficult way 124. Graded assignments must be bound to be done in confined environment 125. NO 126. Students should be given proper and exact feeling of the course of what we are going to do in this course and why we are learning this The students are taught hello world program in the very first lecture and many people take time to except the thing 127. No 128. make interesting as much as possible 129. More data structures and member functions should be included 130. no 131. no 132. the thing I want to suggest is that they should provide testcases for ungraded assignment too and it should also have a auto evaluating system 133. It would be nice to create some sort of extra work learning opportunities for the ones who already have learnt the course topics beforehand 134. Good can be improved 135. Very less questions are given for the practice As assignment is given for 1 week 4 questions are very less and can be increased to 10 as their is sufficient time 136. Theory books required 137. Must be given more hours credits 138. Nothing 139. Nope 140. No 141. give more emphasis on linking different contents of the course with each other also answers to lab assignments should be discussed in class after the deadline 142. no 143. Almost everything is good 144. This course is 10 on 10 145. No 146. Ungraded assignments should have same evaluation platform as graded assignments 147. NOPE 148. none 149. Could split in two batches on basis of prior knowledge 150. Reduce the lecture duration 151. Good 152. Increase assignment weight age and decrease exam weight age 153. Nothing 154. none 155. May be some tweaks in course structure Some concepts like pointers and iterators could have been introduced earlier in the course 156. The course is good and gives an insight into world of coding It was taught very well 157. Duration should be extended to cover more topic 158. Very good course 159. Please take care of what i said in the disliked part 160. No 161. till now i found Parag Singla as the best teacher in iit 162. There should be more practice problems given 163. None 164. slow the course 165. All assignments should be graded No ungraded assignment 166. Moodle playground for all even those who are not registered for course and it should work from non iitd wifi 167. Level of difficulty for graded assignment should be increased gradually not instantly as done in our case 168. More practice questions on later topics as those difficult 169. Graded Assignments not counted as said 170. No 171. Please add more practice problems 172. No suggestions 173. Video lectures are needed 174. for those students who does not know more about computer an extera class should be conducted 175. Course planning should be done properly 176. Assignments were more helpful than examination 177. More problems should be discussed in the class 178. Include live computer programming during lectures 179. Time waste 180. Everything is fine about this course 181. Less time should be spent on previous topics 182. nice 183. Please teach both library function in class itself 184. Well handled 185. No comments 186. None 187. No opinion 188. More grading assignment from last topic 189. No 190. More practise questions should be provided to students 191. No opinion 192. the assignments could have been graded based on how efficient they were rather than only on test case passing 193. In lab sessions new concepts may be taught or at least students should be motivated or helped out to learn them on their own 194. I think it s name should have been CPP100 195. I haven t any suggestions 196. class can be of shorter length 197. No comments 198. No comments 199. No 200. nothing 201. nah 202. No 203. No 204. The number of graded and their contribution to the course in terms of marks should be increased while improving the regulations against those who practice plagiarism Provide more practice problems as i was unable to get adequate practice hence low grade 205. Nothing 206. Difficulty of graded assignment should be increased and the teaching speed of course should beade faster 207. no opinion 208. No 209. no 210. More ungraded questions should be there 211. No 212. Please make it more interesting so that we go along with the course and do something better 213. More practice may improve understanding 214. Lecture notes should be given more briefly 215. Nice and superb course 216. I felt like this was the perfect way to introduce us to computer science and it couldn t ave been any better 217. It s great 218. everything is good about this course and nothing need to be change 219. We should be provided more test cases in graded assignments 220. No 221. none 222. No 223. there should be more lab sessions the which is delivered should also be in labs so that we can understand more 224. No opinion 225. no 226. teacher should teach students from begining and basics so that the student who is new to the course can also understand 227. It was too heavy Every week you get new assignment 228. it is a fine course 229. Graded assignments must be given at such time so that we can do them freely and without any pressure also problems must be made such that there are least chances of cheating 230. the course should have been more logical than being lengthy 231. Due to tough questions many of us lost interest in this subject 232. No 233. it should include topics on how computer memory works at the most basic level 234. everything is fine just look into the assignments testcase matter 235. to achieve gradual increase in progress their should be an increase in no of assignment 236. Reducing the lecture duration 237. No comments 238. Nothing 239. Maybe not teach Stanford library a standard progression would let us make use of other online sources 240. no comments 241. No suggestions 242. Please use only one library 243. Submission procedure of assignments should be explained in the class 244. It was good 245. no 246. It should be made easy as students don t know about it in detail and they had not done it before 247. Please do not use Stanford library 248. None 249. No 250. none 251. I wish i could pursue this course but i cant due to inflexible system of iit 252. no 253. no comments 254. No 255. No opinion 256. The class could have been a bit more in the beginning of the course 257. no 258. No 259. no 260. instead of explaning much examples must be shown 261. Course speed should be made moderate 262. Everything thing is good but I think the pace of this course can be increased a bit 263. no comments 264. May follow a book so that students learning coding for the first time can get help from the book 265. No 266. Everything is fine 267. nothing 268. Can involve mathematics more 269. increase no of graded assts and decrease no of non graded ones 270. the best course of this semester and also the best instructor 271. Should increase the region to be covered 272. None It was fine 273. No 274. None 275. nil 276. Increase algorithmic thinking and understanding of c especially object oriented programming 277. No comments 278. Keep it up 279. No 280. None 281. Only Standard library should be taught 282. Good questions must be uploaded in some website 283. The Computer Science Courses must be more than 2 in each semester as CS IT is the flourishing Industry of this time 284. if stanford libraries were taught then only those functions should be taught that are not present in stl 285. nope 286. The course was good 287. Try including more concepts in the course 288. No 289. Please put some options for non intrested students of computer science Because some students are from poor backgrounds they even don t know how the computer works 290. Try to be more practical and spend more time 291. It would be helpful especially before the exams if there were practice questions non graded that could be done by willing students Also exposure to a little tougher questions would be nice The attendance policy of the lab should be clearly stated 292. no 293. It would be more helpful if we had more practice questions to help us prepare for the exams 294. No 295. No comment 296. No 297. try to think about those who never have been related to programming world so please give some time to understand the topic so that they can use their understanding to applicate them in problems Inshort enough time and low workload may increase the succes 298. No 299. nope 300. NO 301. Just that a number of pen and paper tests can be conducted instead of the graded assignments 302. no comments 303. The lecture sessions can be more interactive and interesting 304. More examples can be discussed and the difficulty level can be subsequently increased in every lecture 305. it was good 306. The latter part of the course could be taught with a little pace Asit deals with a lot of logical aspect 307. Either the content must be reduced or number of lectures must be increased 308. introduce oops the students have been using it throughout the course but don t know what it is actually 309. practicals should be given more emphasis 310. questions should be relatively easy 311. More time should be given for completing assignments 312. nope 313. GRADED ASSIGNMENTS SHOULD BE EVALUATED ACCORDING TOTHE EARLIER COURSE POLICY OF 5 6 314. No 315. No 316. Please include more topics of languages You can also do that as this is only a introductory course so you can teach two languages each language half semester basics of both 317. Should start with more deeper level 318. No 319. NA 320. It is a nice course 321. Course itself 322. increase number of assingments and there thoughness level too 323. ok need more regulaar homework 324. Less assignment 325. no 326. teach poinnters before abstract data types 327. Its interesting 328. All are not of same level People had already studied this earlier 329. Give us more practice questions to solve Make the graded assignments easier Have a fixed grading policy in assignments to avoid confusion 330. Good keep it up 331. No 332. please keep only one library either Stanford library or stl 333. No 334. This course is too heavy 335. no 336. Make the course less intense 337. No 338. Course saylabus need to be change 339. no opinion 340. no comments 341. Nothing 342. no 343. no 344. none as such 345. none 346. no 347. n 348. no 349. The assignments should have been a little easier |
Practical Component |
| Design of experiments | Organization of lab and conduct of experiments | Evaluation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q1 | Q2 | ||
| Poor (1) | 19 | 25 | 32 | 25 | 51 | Yes | 266 | 258 |
| Average (2) | 76 | 87 | 80 | 86 | 100 | No | 64 | 64 |
| Good (3) | 115 | 123 | 130 | 128 | 131 | No Opinion | 166 | 174 |
| Very Good (4) | 129 | 119 | 133 | 119 | 100 | |||
| Excellent (5) | 109 | 91 | 92 | 102 | 73 | |||
| No Opinion (0) | 48 | 51 | 29 | 36 | 41 | |||
| Question-wise rating | 3.52 | 3.37 | 3.37 | 3.41 | 3.1 | |||
| Overall Rating : 3.35 |
|---|
|
QUESTIONS:- Design of experiments Q1. To what extent did the experiments provide new insights and /or encourage you to think creatively? Q2. Were adequate background material / instructions provided for carrying out the experiments? Organization of lab and conduct of experiments Q1. To what extent was systematic execution of lab work emphasized? Q2. To what extent was analysis of observations/ results encouraged? Q3. To what extent was the teacher involved in the practical work? Evaluation Q1. Was the feedback on your lab performance prompt? Q2. Was the feedback on your laboratory work useful? |
|
Q. No. 1 : What did you like most about this course? (Responses: 318) 1. nothing 2. TA s were so supportive and understanding 3. No Opinion 4. Nothing 5. Na 6. No comments 7. instructions provided for carrying out the experiments 8. no comment 9. Helpful TAs 10. nothing 11. nil 12. vjlkk 13. NA 14. nothing 15. independent home assignmenets 16. Good projects 17. It was interesting 18. Helped clear doubts 19. The TA s were very helpful 20. Creativity 21. Course 22. Teacher were helpful 23. I started to like coding as it encouraged me to think logically 24. Interesting lab questions 25. Regularity and seriousness 26. Teaching assistant helps us in lab is good 27. quite logical 28. Interaction with professors and TA 29. good practise 30. This course is very interesting 31. Logical thinking 32. The interaction between the TAs and the students was really very good 33. it had enabled us to experiment with the codes 34. here we can ask our doubts freely to the TAs that one is most important for me 35. ta s were helpful 36. recursion one of the easiest part 37. Its innovative and interesting 38. practical knowledge 39. held regularly 40. TAs were available most of the time 41. It increases our logical thinking 42. Whole course 43. same as above 44. It s representation in class and way of teaching 45. The course is very instersting and require a lot of thinking 46. already done upside 47. learning a new skill was nice 48. It is the base of modern technology 49. Logical thinking 50. Coding is fun 51. Encouragement for independent thinking and new approaches 52. They give good questions and best part was they send it on moodle 53. Help to understand class concept effectively 54. Graded assignment 55. Same 56. All topics were covered 57. Assignments 58. Nothing 59. It made a good basic introduction to the computer science 60. Coding 61. Simple and logical 62. This course was very challenging It taught how to think algorithmically and efficiently The best course of the semester 63. It improved logic thinking and the classes were interactive 64. I like coding so as it a coding related course I like it 65. No comments 66. Nothing special 67. Assignments 68. nothing 69. Good 70. If someone complete his her program quickly then he she can leave the lab by marking attendance 71. nothing 72. Got to learn about programming starting from zero 73. Thinking in every step 74. Nice experience learnt about c 75. First time i have dobe coding in my life It was not a good experience 76. The way they encourage us 77. Logical thinking 78. Helped me learn basics of c 79. Graded Assignments 80. Intresting 81. The effort made by the professor on encouraging independent thinking 82. once you get to learn coding it is really fun 83. encourages independent and logical thinking 84. Interaction between ta and students 85. Nothing 86. this course increase my thinking ability 87. Idea of thinking 88. The best thing was that it gives you an opportunity to learn coding although it was very tough to survive 89. The labs and The content 90. Logical 91. It s good 92. It was interesting 93. LOGIC USED IN QUESTION 94. this course is very much interesting 95. The brain storming codes 96. The TAs were very helpful and supportive 97. Practicals helped a lot to make theories crystal clear 98. Eberything 99. Good questions in the assignments 100. Nothing 101. Good exposure 102. Practice questions 103. Nothing at all 104. Labs 105. Labs were really good it is here where i learned most about the course 106. Nonrequirement of rote learning 107. Questions 108. Learned basically how the computer interprets things 109. The assignments were holistic 110. Frequent evaluation ensured regular practice 111. Nothing 112. Questions given 113. No 114. Everything 115. No opinion 116. The assignments and promotion to think as good and as logical solutions possible 117. We can ask doubt from TA s 118. The course is very good 119. logical thinking 120. Encouraging independent thinking 121. solving complex programmes 122. i am more interested in computers and hence liked all the lectures and assignments so much 123. The logical thinking is the best thing about this course there is absolutely no need to mug up ant formulae or anything 124. The assignments were fun and challenging 125. Very good to develop logical reasoning 126. Good questions 127. Teachers enthusiasm for making students understand the course 128. I like solving graded assignments a lot The questions were quite good 129. Assignment 130. Practice of subject 131. nice questions 132. New things 133. Good assignments 134. Practical assignment questions were of excellent quality They greatly enhanced my knowledge and problem solving 135. TA explain nicely 136. Encouraged to think 137. Logical thinking enhanced interest 138. NOPE 139. the teacher and the thinking involved in the course 140. No opinions 141. TAs there are too good They listen each problem of each child 142. Teacher 143. problem solving through different algorithms was emphasized 144. The labs of col100 are really well equipped and lab sessions were sometimes very assisitive 145. It gives us chance to work ourselves and ask doubts individually TAs personally attended doubts 146. Good thoughtfull assignments 147. This course is very good for beginner level coders It introduced me to this world really nicely 148. Coding 149. Professor 150. graded assignments 151. Lab assignment 152. Tas are helpful 153. Good questions given in labs 154. The teaches 155. Coding 156. Very interesting 157. The course gave an excellent introduction of programming to students from non programming background 158. Instructor PARAG SINGLA 159. Something we could think Encourages logical thinking 160. Logical thinking was involved 161. Logical and understandable 162. Nothing 163. Everything 164. The online portal for running code and the grading system 165. very workful 166. Coding 167. Assignments were good and TA were helpful 168. Interactive criticism 169. No comments 170. It is fun 171. No opinion 172. Grade assignments 173. Concepts 174. TA were very approaching 175. No opinion 176. Got to solve interesting problems and questions Loved to solve them 177. Content 178. Lab 179. Lab TA we re good 180. independent thinking 181. Some TAs are very helpfull 182. Very interesting 183. As I never had coding it was a little great 184. Assignment 185. n 186. the way it encouraged students to think out of the box 187. Everthing 188. Learnt a lot 189. We should be given lab quiz which should add to the final grade 190. How much it helps me in learning basics of coding 191. working with computers and logical thinking 192. TA 193. Nothing 194. Content 195. Logical thinking used while coding 196. The course involved logical thinking and the sessions were very interactive The assignments were challenging and interesting 197. In the labs we were asked to think differently 198. Assignments 199. Nothing 200. Nothing 201. labs 202. No opinion 203. intersting 204. logical thinking 205. the subject and the subject teacher 206. increased understanding by performing practical 207. Logical thinking 208. the assignments really made me think out of the box 209. assignment helps in preparation of exams 210. very good 211. Nothing 212. Proper labs 213. Practicing coding gave me new perspectives on tackling problems 214. the teacher was excellent 215. Got introduced to programming 216. Improved our ability to think and apply algorithm to complete a task 217. logical application of our ideas 218. Practice questions and get to know about new tricks to solve codes 219. Writing code was fun 220. The course structure 221. The teaching assistants were kind and helpful 222. helped a lot to learn language 223. It was in multiple ways by prof sorav sir 224. coding 225. the teaching assistants were very helpful 226. Sharpens the brain 227. Nothing 228. TAs was very helpful 229. Assignments are good and provide so much understanding of the concepts 230. Proper plan of exams 231. everything 232. It was about something which I never studied before 233. Labs were good 234. It was useful in the starting of the course when we had no idea 235. It is the perfect place to clear your doubt 236. the TA S in the lab were initially helpful But after introducing the partially graded assignments they have insisted us to do the work by browsing Which was really helpful and made me learn how to clear my doubts by myself 237. NA 238. Reasoning and thinking 239. Learning new things in every lecture 240. Very well structured interesting assignments 241. c 242. TAs were good 243. introduction to algorithms and more emphasis on problem solving 244. Nothing as it was not able to give the complete idea of what this field is 245. Coding 246. Great interaction with others 247. learning c 248. Too easy 249. It is of much use as we are applying the concepts which we learnt in the lecture in the lab 250. Thinking about algorithms 251. Everything 252. The way it was organised 253. Logic applications 254. Nice 255. i answered it already 256. nope 257. Assignments 258. Algorithm varaitions 259. Coding 260. This course is good for CS students and the intrested ones Something new is there in this course that might be fine for some students 261. Nothing 262. Answered above 263. all 264. the assignments were designed well and helped improve understanding of the topics covered in class in quick time 265. The topics taught were very interesting and were understood very clearly through the lectures 266. Independent thinking 267. Independent thinking 268. No comment 269. It made theoretical knowledge applicable 270. i don t like much in this course except exposure to the programming world and to evaluate myself 271. Assignment 272. everything 273. I got to learn coding for the first time 274. Labs were the best part of the COL course The provide hands on experience and clears most of our doubts 275. nothing 276. As said earlier it taught us to code 277. practical thinking 278. The basic understanding of programming languages was made clear 279. Inspired doing things that can t be done by just learning the theory and doing things in mind and on paper 280. Some topics i hadn t studied before 281. logical thinking abilty 282. creative thinking 283. Nothing 284. TA were helping 285. COURCE CONTENT 286. Thinking 287. We don t have practicals in this course 288. everything 289. Everything 290. Nothing 291. It encourages logical and analytical thinking 292. Course itself 293. no opinion 294. logical presentation 295. Coding 296. nice 297. the course instructor the ta s and the way of teaching 298. No opinion 299. TAs were helpful 300. Coding 301. Nothing 302. Assignment questions they were really interesting and difficult it helped to develop thinking skills 303. Extent of Practice 304. Nothing 305. It builds our logical thinking 306. Teacher and TA 307. Same as mentioned before 308. Learns C 309. no opinion 310. no comments 311. Nothing 312. stanford library 313. content 314. Nothing 315. no 316. sa 317. nothing 318. nothing Q. No. 2 : What did you dislike the most about this course? (Responses: 317) 1. nothing 2. nothing 3. No Opinion 4. Nothing 5. Na 6. No comments 7. everything well 8. no comment 9. Nothing as such 10. nothing 11. nil 12. bjkhlj 13. NA 14. nothing 15. nothing 16. Ungraded assignments should be graded 17. Stanford library 18. Having no previous knowledge of coding it was tough 19. The lab was sometimes a formality as students openly discussed graded assignments 20. Short time span 21. Course 22. There was some problems with pc sometimes 23. A lil frustration bcoz of not getting marks due to silly mistakes and tim lag 24. Things not taught in class have to be used 25. The graded assignments were given without sufficient understanding and practice 26. No 27. too much of assignments 28. Difficulty level 29. the time availibility 30. Nothing 31. Nothing 32. The assignments should be a test of the students ability and thus should be allowed to be done only in the lab sessions in front of the TAs 33. the graded assignments 34. i don t think so 35. whats the use of a practical lab period if we have to do things of our own we can even do that from hostels 36. File I O too many confussions 37. Nothing 38. nothing 39. graded assignments 40. Duration of labs 41. It was too difficult to understand 42. Nothing 43. same as above 44. Time for assignments 45. Lot of hard work is required to be expert 46. already done upside 47. sometimes too much workload during assignments 48. Less time was given 49. Heavy work load 50. The TAs were not too interactive 51. Nothing 52. Labs during start 53. Time was not effectively utilised in lab 54. All topics are not covered 55. Same 56. Work load 57. Nothing 58. Nothing 59. Tough Questions 60. Big 0 61. Lengthy ordinary codes 62. The examples that were taught in the class should have been more difficult and vast as it caused a lot problem while solving the graded assignment 63. the lecture becomes monotonous after some time and the complication related to the use of SPL in class and practice but the use STL in graded assignments 64. nothing 65. No comments 66. Everything 67. Nothing 68. No one cares about the difference created between the students who have no coding background and the ones who knew coding before 69. Heavy Burden 70. We do not learn something new 71. nothing 72. Work load was too heavy 73. Nothing 74. It was very tough for me 75. The questions that were asked in exam were nowhere related to the examples done in class We should have been given practice questions All we got was graded assignments which were very tough It was not possible for one mediocre person do it all alone 76. Nothing 77. Very tough assignments and exams 78. Very tough graded assignments 79. The TAs can t pay attention to every student properly 80. Too much syllabus 81. Tough level of assignments 82. the teacher doesn t encourage independent thinking 83. too much work load and hard stuff the course seems biased as it is quiet easy for students who have learned coding before to score easily in early exams like minor 1 84. No opinion 85. Nothing 86. teachers behave like the studnt already know much much about subject 87. Less question are done in the lecture 88. This course is too tough which eventually results in dying interest in the course 89. The way the exams are taken 90. Nothing 91. None 92. Workload of assignments and their deadlines 93. THE REGULAR GRADED ASSIGNMENT 94. in starting we need to put hard work to get in flow 95. Their quantity 96. The assignments were big thus finishing them in 1 lab is difficult 97. TA s sometimes couldn t figure out what all mistakes did we make in our assignments thus they were unable to fulfil the elementary task alotted to them and this further led to too much time in solving assignments 98. Nothing 99. All assignments should be graded 100. Everything 101. Debugging is tiresome 102. There should be no lab 103. Everything Lab is only for ATTENDANCE 104. TAs 105. My GAs arent graded please grade my GAs 106. None 107. the level increased suddenly 108. Nothing 109. They can t jugde us properly on the basis of these as many people copy steal codes Innocent people also get blamed 110. None 111. Nothing happened 112. In some cases constraints in questions 113. The intensity and amount of work 114. None 115. TA s are not helping in good way 116. Exams 117. The TA will never approach to you by thier own to ask people whether they are doing well or not 118. The course was very good 119. nothing 120. Lesser frequency of assignments 121. nothing 122. ungraded assignments were also said to be graded but i didn t understand how would they grade it so felt a bit unclear 123. the load of assignments sometimes 124. Nothing 125. Actually we couldnt learn much frm the course I was expecting to learn something higher 126. nothing particular 127. Hectic assignments 128. Less hours assigned to course Also more practical work should be encouraged 129. Nothing 130. No major requirement of lab 131. no sollutions given after the deadline 132. Too much pace and not taught before so need more time to get acquainted 133. Nothing 134. They are not weighed properly Practical questions are arguably harder than questions on minor major yet they are weighed quite less than those 135. Linux 136. Less practice material 137. NOPE 138. i have no idea of how it could have been better 139. Nothing 140. Assignment 141. Wasting time in labs without anything to do Though it occured only a few times 142. Sometimes we had completed the assignments and had nothing special to do in lab So it wasted time 143. Assignments asked us to use standard libraries but we were taught stanford ones in lectures 144. The teachers did not even introduce us to world of competitive coding which i would really like to explore 145. Nothing 146. Labs were taken rather lightly The assignments could be done even outside the labs which in a way rendered them useless 147. Paper pen tests 148. deadlines 149. Ungraded assignment 150. Nothing 151. Lot of time it has consumed 152. The difficulty of exams 153. None 154. Difficult to grab the concepts 155. Nothing 156. Less emphasis on Syntax 157. Long lectures 158. Workload 159. Lab session 160. Everything 161. Nothing 162. The questions only tested if we can implement the solution in a coding language or not The solutions themselves were simple 163. little bit hard 164. Stanford library cannot be used for assignment 165. Nothing 166. Nothing 167. Sometimes very fast pacing for non coders 168. No comments 169. Nothing 170. No opinion 171. Nothing 172. No 173. Library timing was very bad 174. No opinion 175. The TA s weren t that helpful to our learning Didn t teach something new and different Everything was left on lectures Lab sessions were not useful at all 176. Length of lecture 177. Syllabus 178. Nothing 179. length of class 180. Sometime it is time waste 181. Eats up the mind when no clue strikes the mind for solving the question 182. Not explaining property and examples were not clear 183. Nothing 184. n 185. the lab sessions 186. Heavy homework every week 187. Assignments 188. writing code on paper is not the best way of programming according to me 189. Workload 190. end part is very subtle 191. nothing 192. Everything 193. Work load 194. Nothing 195. Nothing 196. The labs were of less duration so we were not able to get maximum advantage out of it 197. Stanford Library functions 198. Nothing 199. lecture clsses 200. Nothing 201. time taking 202. some of the graded assignments were too tough 203. Graded assignments 204. discipline in lab 205. Nothing 206. nothing in particular 207. in assignments you can not see the all testcases so it makes hard to check the the fault in code 208. nothing 209. Everything 210. In starting we are told that n 1 GA assignment will be evaluated out of n but in end they evaluated all n 211. It s frustrating when the code doesn t work 212. nothing 213. More grade oriented Use only one library 214. It was not able to keep student s constant intrest in it 215. nothing 216. Mixing of standard and Stanford library made it very difficult 217. Nothing 218. The workload was a bit too much 219. nothing 220. practical work was less 221. Lecture notes are poor explanation wise 222. nothing 223. lack of assignments 224. Nothing 225. Everything 226. nothig 227. Assignment copying was checked by a software so sometimes it may happen that coincidentally codes of two students match and they were penalized although they are innocent 228. Moodle grades the assignments weirdly it changes marks everytime even if you write the same code 229. nothing 230. It requires too much time 231. Lab were not so interactive 232. the lab was not helpful later in the course as graded assignments were being solved in the labs and so nothing extra was being learnt 233. Sometimes the question were very easy and the no of questions were less 234. nothing 235. No definite task in the lab 236. Confusion on libraries 237. Ungraded assignment 238. nothing 239. Less topics were taught 240. NOthing 241. nothing 242. The codes that the professor make should be made of some ide as in some cases even the prof conveys some wrong thing 243. When program don t work 244. Some problems with Moodle evaluator 245. it takes time to digest 246. Didn t cover much in depth 247. nothing 248. Nothing as such 249. Nothing 250. All ok 251. Nothing 252. Nil 253. i answered it already 254. nope 255. It is at early morning 256. Non automatic evaluation of Non Graded assignments 257. Grading process 258. This couse is totally imposed over us We didn t take this department by our choice then also it has been taught to us We are not able to learn clearly because we were not having any computer background 259. The TAs weren t helpful 260. Answered above 261. none 262. We can t submit assignments without using iit delhi wifi network So submitting assignments from home is not possible 263. The course is too hectic 264. nothing 265. Some graded assignments required a lot of thinking or debugging which lead to unnecessary pressure on average students like me 266. No comment 267. Nothing 268. grading policy of the course In starting of the course they declared that graded assignments will be consisting of 25marks but at the last moment they changed their policy so much confusion with lab assignment 1st declared ungraded then they declare them 269. Nothing 270. nothing 271. Difficulty 272. I didn t dislike anything in specific about the course 273. nothing 274. Very few examples were discussed in class 275. question papers were hard 276. The pace to cope up with theentirely new topic for newbies 277. Occurred just once a week Should occur twice 278. a repeatition of most of the things for me 279. time constraints 280. nothing 281. Nothing 282. nothing 283. PARAG SINGLA S HANDWRITING 284. Lab not required 285. We don t have practicals in this course 286. nothing 287. Nothing 288. Everything 289. It is my belief that students who actually copy graded assignments from others their names do not appear in the list of copying students Rather the ones who do not copy but somehow their code matches with someone else their names appear in that list 290. Course itself 291. nothing 292. less ta in lab 293. Different libraries 294. nothing 295. nothing much 296. No opinion 297. Confusion in SPL and STL initially and forcing us to use QT creator 298. GA was tough 299. Nothing 300. Stanford library 301. More test cases should be revealed 302. This course shouldn t be compulsory for all branches students 303. nothing in particular 304. Work load 305. Same as mentioned before 306. Work load was too heavy 307. no opinion 308. no comments 309. Nothing 310. nothing 311. no 312. nothing as such just the batch size 313. Everything 314. no 315. sa 316. exam and assignment questions 317. nothing Q. No. 3 : How effective was the help provided by the teaching assistants? (Responses: 330) 1. nothing 2. whatever i learnt in this course was from TAs 3. No Opinion 4. Good 5. Na 6. No comments 7. excellent 8. no comment 9. Quite a lot 10. good 11. nil 12. yuhoiuo 13. NA 14. nothing 15. good 16. great 17. Good 18. It was good 19. They helped us with the doubts 20. Very effective 21. Nice 22. Very helpful 23. Vwry effectively 24. They helped whenever we ask doubts 25. It was okay 26. No help taken 27. Excellent 28. Very good 29. quite effective 30. Very well 31. good 32. Very helpful 33. Very effective 34. Really Good 35. it was very effective 36. the are very helpful persons 37. they were very helpful 38. excellent 39. Many times it is very useful 40. good 41. good 42. Great 43. They were ver helpful 44. Average 45. Well 46. they were good they gave their 100 in the lab 47. not so much help is provided by teaching assistant 48. Good 49. Not very much effective 50. They were very helpful 51. They were quite effective and helpful 52. Very helping 53. Good 54. The TAs were not too interactive 55. Very helpful 56. Average 57. Very Good 58. Good 59. Wasn t quite helpful 60. Good 61. No 62. Yes 63. Nothing much due to large strength 64. Ok 65. Ok 66. They were very effective in helping to clear the concepts discuss some extra subtopics or give some help function 67. it was somewhat in the middle not that great and not that poor but the TA s were eager to solve our problems 68. very much effective they are very friendly and coorporative 69. No comments 70. Very good 71. not much effective 72. It s good 73. Not much effective 74. not much 75. They were efficient in their work 76. They give idea 77. They were quite helpful 78. Our T As were not good at all They would only mock at us that we don t know such easy things They should understand that we are not qualified as them Labs became torturous and waste of time They think that we should learn everything in classs only 79. Very helpful 80. The teaching assistants could be a bit more polite and helpful 81. Very nice 82. Okay 83. Good 84. Quite good 85. It was effective but only up to some extent 86. they were not very helpful whenever we ask a doubt they used to say check your logic They were not very enthusiastic to solve our problem 87. not much it varied from group to group 88. Very good 89. Very 90. quite effective 91. They helped each and everytime 92. The teaching assistants were very good at helping 93. Very effective 94. Very effective 95. A little idea 96. Much effective 97. GOOD 98. They helped everytime whenever we needed 99. Nice and sufficient 100. They were very helpful 101. No help by them were provided Even to the limit they were allowed they couldn t help us till that level 102. Very effective 103. good 104. None 105. Good 106. TAs were much helpful 107. Nothing They don t develop the thinking skills 108. Help is not effective Its poor 109. They were helpful but getting their attention was really Hard 110. It was effective helped a lot 111. Very good 112. Very helpful 113. They were very helpful 114. Very effective 115. Effective 116. Great 117. Good 118. A tiny bit 119. very much they helped very much in the lab 120. Enormous 121. Average 122. Much helped a lot to debug code when stuck somewhere between 123. Very good but some TA are not such effective to let us understand the problem properly 124. Very effective 125. average 126. Very helpful inside as well as outside class 127. helped a lot clearing doubts 128. they are very helpful in clarifying the confusions i had 129. the teaching assistants were really helpful initially when we were in the earlier stage of course 130. Very good helpful 131. Very effectively 132. TA do not help much in clearing our doubts They just say google it 133. Very nice 134. Quiet Good 135. Excellent 136. Very good 137. good 138. Okayish 139. Very good 140. TAs atleast those assigned to our lab session were knowledgeable and provided adequate technical support 141. Very effective 142. Good 143. good 144. NOPE 145. it was effective 146. Pretty good 147. Excellent 148. Not much 149. They were friendly and co operative 150. Teaching assistants were very effective and interactive They gave personal attention 151. Very helpful 152. The help provided by the TA s was very good They provided as much help as they could in the assignments 153. Very good 154. The questions asked were answered nicely 155. Awesome they are best TAs 156. avg 157. Good 158. Very nice 159. Always helpful 160. Good but not sufficient 161. Good 162. Average 163. Quite effective 164. They were very good at correcting our mistakes 165. Good 166. good 167. Not good at all 168. Online help desk was very useful 169. No effect 170. They were helpful 171. Very good They even took doubts Individually 172. very effective 173. Yes 174. Good 175. Very helpful 176. TA were not much good 177. No comments 178. They re good 179. No opinion 180. Good 181. Very good 182. They were very approaching 183. No opinion 184. It was the least helpful in comparison to all other things They sometimes did not provide adequate instructions to do the lab work Only sometimes they gave useful advice otherwise I found them confusing and ignorant 185. Good 186. Nice question 187. Excellent 188. helped correcting and understanding concepts 189. Depend on TA Some are good 190. Helped me learn the syntax and their applications 191. Yeah they were good and helps in every problem 192. Nice 193. n 194. not so helful 195. Good 196. Good 197. adequate 198. Ok 199. they were very helpful especially in lab sessions 200. Very effective 201. very important 202. Good 203. Nice very helpful and friendly 204. Helpful 205. Very Effective 206. The TAs were good and helpful and were never seemed to be ignorent 207. Not much 208. They gave their best and helped a lot 209. Not so much 210. they are very helpful 211. Yes 212. good enough 213. very less 214. not much effective for me as i hardly asked any question to them 215. they were very helpful 216. they where helpful 217. They were helpful and responsive to our evey query 218. TAs were helpful and were able to clarify most doubts 219. Very helpful gained more insight 220. the interaction with TA are so much good you can can any doubt from TA easily without any hesitation 221. very good they helped a lot in lab 222. Very much effective 223. No comments 224. Really helpful in lab assignment 225. Excellent I could ve asked for nothing more 226. yes 227. Average Not good 228. Quite effective 229. Average 230. ok 231. Not that good 232. They were very helpful and gave us some new tricks to solve problems 233. It was sure effective thanks to Piazza 234. Very effective 235. It was absolutely the best they could do 236. very less 237. Awesome 238. nice 239. it was great 240. Very effective 241. Poor 242. excellent 243. TA s are so much helpful they provides help during lab hours and clear many concepts 244. Help sessions were good 245. Very little They mostly concentrate on those people who are good at coding already 246. Was good 247. The TA s helped a lot in debugging and explaining the things we had done wrong 248. TAs were very helpful in this course 249. good 250. Not so effective 251. It was very helpful 252. Help through piazza quite effective and adequate 253. as much they can 254. Very good 255. Was as much as required 256. they were very cooperative and helped a lot in creating new codes 257. Was good 258. Very much 259. Very good 260. very good 261. Very good 262. In the best possible way whenever they can 263. The TAs were very helpful and receptive to doubts 264. Very effective 265. Good 266. Nothing much 267. Nice 268. excellent they helped in all sort of problems that were faced by me they also explained any concepts that were not properly understood by me 269. nope 270. Good 271. Good in clearing doubts regarding various errors 272. Very good 273. Teaching assistants were very good They help us in every lab session 274. Not much 275. I personally never asked them for any help However it appeared to be quite ineffective Their casual attitude regarding the students was very disappointing 276. not much 277. It would be more helpful if we had more practice questions to help us prepare for the exams 278. Highly efficient and good 279. Quite effective 280. No comment 281. Quite helpful 282. Not upto the mark 283. Fine 284. very effective 285. Effective to a certain extent 286. TAs were very helping and cooperative They were very effective in their approach of guiding 287. very effective 288. They were helpful It helped us a lot while solving lab assignments 289. good 290. Very effective 291. They were really helpful and insisted better learning 292. Not required 293. not much they only helped in syntax atmost 294. very effective 295. Average 296. very good 297. VERY HELPFUL 298. Good 299. We don t have practicals in this course 300. very good 301. Nice 302. Not at all 303. It was helpful to a great extent 304. Course itself 305. no so much 306. good 307. Good 308. helpfull 309. very helpful and suppotive 310. No opinion 311. Excellent 312. Very interactive 313. Average 314. extremely effective they were really helpful 315. Good enough 316. Poor 317. they helped a lot 318. Great 319. Same as mentioned before 320. Not much useful 321. no opinion 322. no comments 323. Nothing 324. good 325. nicely handled 326. None 327. no 328. sa 329. fine 330. nothing Q. No. 4 : Were the facilities/equipments adequate for the experiments? (Responses: 321) 1. nothing 2. yes 3. No Opinion 4. Yes 5. Na 6. No comments 7. yes 8. no comment 9. Yes 10. yes 11. nil 12. guhouo 13. NA 14. nothing 15. yes 16. yes 17. Excellent 18. Yeah they have 19. Yes 20. Yes 21. Yes 22. Yes 23. Yess It was fine 24. Yes 25. Excellent 26. Yes 27. yes 28. Yes 29. yes 30. Yes 31. Yes 32. Yes 33. yes 34. yes ofcourse 35. yes a computer was required thats it 36. yes 37. Yes 38. yes 39. good 40. Yes 41. Yes 42. Yes 43. Yes 44. yes 45. yes we have excellent facilities 46. Yes 47. Yes Lab and CSC were sufficient 48. yes 49. Yes 50. Yeah 51. Yes 52. No 53. Yes 54. No probably they should explain more 55. Yes 56. Yes 57. Yes 58. Average 59. Yes 60. Yes 61. Yeah 62. Yes 63. Yes 64. Yes 65. yes the facilities were adequate 66. yes 67. No comments 68. Yes 69. Yes 70. yes 71. Yaa 72. Yes equipment were adequate 73. no 74. Yes 75. No opinion 76. Yes 77. For labs yeah the equipments were proper 78. Yes 79. Yes 80. Yes 81. No opinion 82. Yes 83. Yes 84. yes 85. yes 86. Very good 87. Yes 88. Yes 89. Yes 90. Yes 91. Yes 92. Yes 93. Yes 94. YES 95. yes 96. Yes 97. Yes they were on point 98. Yes 99. Yes 100. good 101. Yes 102. Yes 103. Yes they were 104. Yes 105. Yes 106. Yes they were 107. Yes 108. Nope 109. Yes 110. Yep 111. Yes 112. Yes 113. Yes 114. Nope Need more lab hours 115. yes 116. Yes 117. Yes 118. Yes 119. Yes 120. Yes 121. yes 122. Yes 123. yes 124. yes 125. yeah of course 126. Yes 127. Yes the were enough Just i would recoment windows in the lab pcs 128. yes 129. Yes 130. Yes 131. Good 132. Yes 133. yes 134. Yes 135. 100 136. Yes 137. Yes 138. yes 139. NOPE 140. yes 141. Yes 142. Yes 143. Yes 144. Yes 145. Yes however many computers got hanged while coding and I had to write the code again Otherwise the equipment is adequate 146. Yes 147. Yes 148. Yes 149. yes 150. yes 151. yup 152. Yes 153. Yes 154. Some problems were occured in using the computers but it was due to lack of experience in ubantu 155. Yes 156. Yes 157. Yes 158. Yes 159. Yes 160. Yes 161. yes 162. No 163. Yes 164. No 165. Yes 166. yes 167. yes 168. Sometimes no in general yes 169. Yes 170. Yes 171. No comments 172. Yes 173. No opinion 174. Yes 175. Yes 176. Yes 177. No opinion 178. Yes this is where appreciation is must The facilities were excellent and sufficient for all the activities and lab sessions 179. Yes 180. Nice question 181. Excellent 182. yes 183. Yes 184. Yes 185. Yeah they were more than enough 186. Good 187. n 188. yes 189. Yes 190. Good 191. yes 192. Yes 193. yes 194. Yes 195. Bad 196. Yup 197. Yes 198. Yes 199. Yeah much 200. Yes 201. No opinion 202. yes 203. No opinion 204. yes 205. yes 206. yes 207. yes to a great extent 208. yes 209. Yes 210. yes 211. Yes 212. what can i say the computers were good in the lab 213. Yes 214. No comments 215. Yes 216. Adequate 217. yes 218. Yes all are perfect 219. Yes 220. Yes 221. yes 222. Yes 223. Yes they were adequate 224. Yes computer were all good 225. Yes 226. Yes 227. yes 228. No opinion 229. yes 230. yes 231. Yes 232. No 233. yes 234. Yes 235. Yes 236. Yes 237. Yes 238. Yes 239. Yes 240. along the half way through the course it was good But initially when there wasn t moodle playground we found it to be a bit hard 241. NA 242. Yes 243. Yes all the facilities were adequate 244. Yes 245. yes 246. Yes 247. Yes 248. yes 249. No platform to code properly outside labs 250. Yes 251. Yes 252. yes 253. Adequate but the computers were very very slow 254. Yes 255. No 256. Yes 257. Yes 258. Yes 259. Yes 260. yes definitely 261. nope 262. Yes it is useful 263. Yes 264. Yes 265. Equipments were very good 266. Yes 267. Yes 268. yes 269. Yes 270. yes 271. Yes 272. No comment 273. Yes 274. No opinion 275. Yes 276. yes 277. Yes 278. Yes 279. yes 280. Yes they were adequate 281. yes 282. Yes 283. Yes 284. yes 285. yes 286. yes 287. Average 288. yes 289. YES 290. Yes 291. We don t have practicals in this course 292. yes 293. Yes 294. Yes 295. Course itself 296. yes 297. ok 298. Yes 299. yes 300. yes 301. No opinion 302. Yes 303. Yes 304. Yes 305. yes 306. Yes 307. Yes 308. yes 309. Yes 310. Same as mentioned before 311. Best ever seen equipments 312. no opinion 313. no comments 314. Nothing 315. yes 316. definitely yes 317. Maybe 318. no 319. sa 320. yes 321. nothing Q. No. 5 : Any Suggestions or comments about the course (Responses: 295) 1. nothing 2. no 3. No Opinion 4. No 5. Na 6. No comments 7. no 8. no comment 9. Excellent course 10. No 11. nil 12. goiup 13. NA 14. nothing 15. nothing 16. It was interesting 17. Lab sessions can be made optional 18. No 19. No 20. No comments 21. No 22. no of assignments should be less 23. No 24. no 25. No suggestions 26. No 27. Just the assignments were a bit problematic 28. no comments 29. no thanks 30. remove the attendance policy at lab instead remove labs 31. no suggestion every thing is ok 32. Nope 33. no 34. no 35. Duration of labs should be flexible It should be according to the work to be done during that week 36. No 37. No 38. same as above 39. More time for assignments 40. Good course and would like to do such course in future 41. It was okay 42. More time allotment for this course 43. Obsolete and useless Ought to be replaced 44. No 45. No suggestions 46. No 47. They should search better way of practice during start 48. No 49. Good one 50. No 51. Same as above 52. No 53. No 54. No comment 55. No 56. No 57. more codes during classes and ungraded graded assignments should be like graded assignments in terms of running test cases 58. no 59. No comments 60. It was a nice course but material for problems were not available 61. Not any 62. The lab assignment questions are same for students having coding background and for the ones having no coding background This ultimately creates a situation of havoc for the students having no coding background 63. No 64. No 65. no 66. It could exclude some of the topics taught 67. No 68. No suggestions 69. Graded assignments did not do much good as students had to do that out of pressure Most take help from others How can this enhance their learning We should do coding by interest and not by force Labs should be meant for practising ques not for assgmnts on 70. Nothing 71. None 72. Please reduce difficulty of graded assignments 73. It s good 74. No 75. No 76. the level of difficulty should have been increased gradually 77. extra support should be given to those who face more difficulty in getting through this 78. No 79. No 80. you should teach basic of the subject 81. More questions should be solved in class 82. Make the course a bit easy please 83. No 84. No 85. Nope 86. No 87. NO 88. no more comments 89. None 90. Make it bit more harder and plan so as to how to evaluate before hand 91. No 92. Make all assignments compulsory and graded 93. No 94. No 95. Course is going almost as it should 96. We should remove this course from 1st year so that those interested in coding and continue from second year as it should be a extra course 97. No 98. My GAs arent graded please grade my GAs 99. None 100. Better idea should have been given by TAs before the course started about the planning 101. None 102. None 103. No 104. There is no way we can learn linux gdb qt creator if they were to be used barely for 2 hrs a week Should find a better way to use them not everyone have them in personal laptop s 105. Conduct majors and minors on computers 106. None 107. TA s should help us in a good way they should not get irritated to our questions and they should help us in learning 108. No need to conduct such lab because thier are many other platforms by which we can clear our doubts such as by teacher Piazza etc It more like TAs to go practical what they are actually meant for 109. No 110. make it more interesting so that student start more thinking 111. More assignments should be present 112. nothing 113. no 114. the thing I want to suggest is that they should provide testcases for ungraded assignment too and it should also have a auto evaluating system 115. No comments 116. Good can be improved 117. no 118. Need of more practice questions to be provided at hand 119. Provide more time and teach OOPS part also 120. Nothing 121. Nope 122. improve more 123. No 124. Nothing 125. Increasing it s weightage 126. No 127. Ungraded assignments should have same evaluation platform as graded assignments 128. NOPE 129. i have no idea of how it could be done better 130. The assignment could be more difficult 131. In ungraded assign compiler should be inbuilt in moodle 132. Nothing 133. Take attendance early and allow those students to leave who have completed their lab work 134. The course is good Labs can be organized in better way And assignments must be given keeping in mind that students have adequate time to do them 135. No 136. Please take care of what i said in the disliked part 137. No 138. none 139. minors in the form of lab 140. Tell students that how the coarse is so interesting Because i know a big of students are not interested in this coarse 141. No 142. No suggestions 143. No 144. None 145. No thanks 146. No suggestions 147. Overall was good 148. initially sir told us that in assignments only best four would be considered But now they are considering all five assignments this is wrong they should have been told us initially 149. No 150. No 151. No 152. No suggestions 153. There should be questions which require first thinking logical and feasible solution and then thinking about how to implement them 154. nice 155. Please teach us more about cpp 156. No comments 157. None 158. No opinion 159. Can be more better 160. No comments 161. More practise question should be provided 162. No opinion 163. Students want some motivation and more help to start coding on their own for the first time And instead of being strict on them one should try to understand their problems For example if extra help sessions were conducted then It would have been more help 164. No 165. DO 166. I haven t any suggestions 167. no comments 168. No comment 169. No comments 170. To make classes more interesting and understanding 171. No 172. n 173. no 174. Nothing 175. No 176. open book lab quiz to be included in each lab open book here means that we should be allowed to search the syntax and other functions required for the program This will help us learn the functions 177. Very good course and neccesary for learning basics of coding 178. no opinion 179. No 180. No comment s 181. Nice and superb course 182. I felt like this was the perfect way to introduce us to computer science and it couldn t ave been any better 183. The lab session duration should be increased 184. Nothing 185. there should be more lab sessions 186. No 187. no 188. Please teach in the class from basics 189. no 190. More focus must be on learning Graded assignments they were not helpful for learning they were just testing our knowledge In labs TAs must take individual viva of students and not grade that viva those vivas must only focus on learning 191. no 192. No 193. nothing in particular 194. everything is fine just look into the assignments testcase matter 195. N A 196. No comments 197. No 198. None specifically 199. no comments 200. Our course coordinator was good and i think this course need some improvement regarding keeping one s intrest and attention 201. no 202. The course is good but its syllabus should be made easy 203. It s was a wonderful course I really loved it I am really thankful to Parag Sir for making this course this much interesting 204. None 205. No 206. none 207. No suggestions but i wish i could pursue it further but my gender and caste will never allow it 208. no 209. no comments 210. No 211. No 212. no 213. No 214. No 215. More examples should be shown and explained in the class 216. Types of possible algo should be discussed to improvise our thinking 217. Please keep the playground for the next year students too 218. no comments 219. NA 220. No 221. Everything is good 222. nothing 223. No comments 224. the best course of this semester and also the best instructor 225. No 226. No 227. None 228. none 229. To increase workload 230. No comments 231. Keep it up 232. None 233. TA should check on their own what work student has done in lab 234. Nothing much 235. Nil 236. if stanford libraries were taught then only those functions should be taught that are not present in stl 237. nope 238. No it is good 239. The Course should be taught to more deeper extent 240. None 241. Please put some options for non intrested students of computer science Because some students are from poor backgrounds they even don t know how the computer works 242. I don t think so 243. Answered above 244. no 245. No 246. More time can be given for graded assignments maybe 2 weeks for an assignment with 5 6 questions 247. No comment 248. No 249. Please explain the course policy in the very start and retain this policy Give appropriate and adequate time for learning a topic overall i am not satisfied with the course 250. No 251. nope 252. No 253. No 254. no 255. Not really 256. no 257. The latter part of the course could be taught with a little pace Asit deals with a lot of logical aspect 258. As said above either course content must be reduced or number of lectures must be increased 259. introduce oops the students have been using it throughout the course but don t know what it is actually 260. no 261. no 262. need no change 263. GRADED ASSIGNMENTS SHOULD BE EVALUATED AS 5 6 264. No 265. We don t have practicals in this course 266. nope 267. No 268. Solutions to the graded and ungraded assignments should be provided after 1 2 weeks of that assignment This will be very helpful 269. Course itself 270. nope 271. No opinion 272. no 273. no oversll a very good course 274. No opinion 275. No further suggestions 276. No 277. No 278. it was a great course I enjoyed a lot 279. No 280. This course is too heavy 281. no 282. Nope 283. No 284. Saylabus need to shorter 285. no opinion 286. no comments 287. Nothing 288. no 289. no 290. none 291. None 292. no 293. sa 294. no 295. nothing |